On the issue of treatment of injury to the inferior alveolar nerve during dental implantation

20.07.2018

The author of the article is Dakhno L.A. Candidate of Medical Sciences, dental surgeon, radiologist.

Post-traumatic neuropathy of the trigeminal system is a sensory disturbance with or without neuropathic pain, often leading to functional and psychological consequences.

The trigeminal nerve is the largest sensory nerve in the body and is responsible for the orofacial region. Iatrogenic injuries of the trigeminal nerve (trigeminal nerve injuries -TNI) lead to pain in 70% of patients, which in turn leads to functional impairments in speech, eating, kissing, shaving, applying makeup, brushing teeth, etc., which means there is a negative impact on self-esteem, quality of life and patient psychology.

It must be understood that after injury to the trigeminal nerve, complete recovery is rare, except in cases of minor injury, so it is very important to maintain a trusting relationship between the dentist and the patient and not give false assurances of a complete recovery.

Nerve damage can occur during any dental procedure: injections of local anesthesia, wisdom tooth extraction, endodontic treatment, as well as at all stages of implantation - from the administration of anesthetic and preparation of the implant bed to implantation, bone augmentation and/or soft tissue swelling after surgery .

Rice. 1 Clinical case. CBCT computed tomography images show fragments of sealer that are directly adjacent to the lumen of the mandibular canal in the area of ​​the mental foramen. The patient complained of paresthesia and pain from touch and wind in the area of ​​the chin and lower lip on the left, which appeared after endodontic treatment of the 34th tooth. After 6 months - paresis (motor disorder) of the left half of the lower lip, which led to the inability to fully drink and eat (the patient holds the lip with her fingers while eating to prevent food and liquid from falling out of the mouth) and, as a result, a stress disorder accompanied by anxiety, fear and fits of anger.

Fig. 2. Removal of the sealer into the mandibular canal due to the absence of an apical stop

Regarding implantation, pain during bone preparation with a pilot drill can be an indicator of the proximity of the nerve and, if this is not addressed immediately (deciding to place a shorter implant), permanent nerve damage can occur.

Nerve injury during implantation is associated primarily with preoperative factors, including poor preoperative planning, which leads to inaccurate measurements and incorrect selection of implantation site and implant type (diameter and length).

Figure 3a. Planning error.

Figure 3b. Incorrect choice of implant length.

Figure 3-a, b. CBCT images from two clinical cases demonstrate implantation-related nerve damage. The implants are inserted directly into the canal of the inferior alveolar nerve, which is associated with errors in preoperative planning.

The habit of carefully planning implantation based on computed tomography data, performing implantation under infiltration anesthesia using surgical guides, performing intraoperative X-ray control and using drill stops (drill stops) can minimize possible nerve injury during implantation.

Any injury (penetration or compression) as well as hemorrhage into the mandibular canal results in acute and often severe intraoperative pain of the neuralgic type and it is imperative that the physician use an appropriate protocol of infiltration local anesthesia so that the patient can indicate the proximity of surgical instruments to the mandibular canal .

Since implantation is the surgery of choice, nerve injury, which leads to potentially irreversible consequences even after repeated surgery (implant removal), can always be avoided.

The physiological consequences of sensory nerve damage are immediate and often irreversible. The inferior alveolar nerve passes through the bony canal, which may be subject to compression and ischemic damage. Compression of peripheral sensory nerves for 6 hours can cause nerve fiber atrophy.

Ischemia itself, even without direct nerve damage, will cause sufficient inflammation and nerve damage that may result in permanent nerve damage.

Figure 4. Sagittal CBCT sections demonstrate an acceptable relationship between the implant and the lumen of the inferior alveolar nerve canal, but the clinical picture is consistent with ischemia, which caused pain and paresthesia. During the first 24 hours, a clinical decision was made to remove the implant and prescribe medication.

Three months after injury to the inferior alveolar nerve, permanent changes in the nervous system, both central and peripheral, will occur, which are unlikely to respond to surgical treatment or respond to drug treatment and peripheral interventions.

When nerve injury occurs, the clinician must be able to recognize the type and extent of injury, provide the most appropriate postoperative care, and be able to make recommendations.

Types of nerve damage:

- complete or partial resection of the nerve (cutting),

- compression, crushing, stretching, pinching, thermal and ischemic damage.

Total sensory deficits can range from minor sensory loss to persistent, severe, and debilitating pain dysfunction, but the most common combinations include anesthesia, paresthesia (painless altered sensation), dysesthesia (uncomfortable altered sensation), and neuropathic pain.

Currently, there is no standardized protocol for the dentist to diagnose and treat post-implant nerve injuries.

We will try to fill this gap.

What is mandibular nerve injury?

By this concept, dentists mean injury to one of the nerves:

• chin;
• lingual;
• alveolar.

Types of injuries include sprain, compression, crushing and rupture - partial or complete. The cause of the stretching is the long-term retraction of the mucoperiosteal flap, which is created by an implant of greater length than necessary. Crush injuries and compression are caused by needle injuries during the administration of anesthesia. Rupture occurs in two cases: when cutting the mucosa or during preparation of the hole for the implant.

How long does a tooth hurt after nerve removal?

It should be noted that pain for several days after removing the nerve and filling the canals is a natural reaction of the body to the intervention. Dentists call this condition post-filling pain. During the procedure of pulp extraction and canal treatment, microtrauma to surrounding tissues is inevitable, so after the anesthesia wears off, the patient may experience discomfort. Normally, they are easily relieved with analgesics and gradually disappear.

The following symptoms indicate complications:

• 5-7 days after removal of the nerve, the tooth still hurts;
• the pain is strong and sharp;
• painkillers do not relieve pain;
• gum inflammation;
• the temperature has risen;
• headache;
• the pain spread to other teeth.

In this case, you should immediately consult a doctor so that he can do an x-ray or CT scan and find out the cause of the complication.

Causes and prevention of mandibular nerve injuries

The only cause of such damage is considered to be medical errors. Since in preparation for implantation, X-rays of the jaw are taken, which the doctor must carefully study so that when choosing an implant and a place for it, he does not injure the nerve, the injuries are caused by his unprofessionalism or negligence.

Damage to the mandibular nerve most often occurs when:

• improper administration of anesthesia - needle injury;
• choosing an implant that is too long;
• damage by an instrument - when preparing the site for the implant.

The only way to avoid such an injury is for a doctor to responsibly approach the stage of preparation for surgery, carefully studying the condition and structure of his patient’s jaw. The only way of prevention for the patient is to choose a trusted clinic and a highly qualified doctor. Specialists at the Implantmaster clinic have been able to reduce the number of injuries of this kind to 2%, since they carefully study three-dimensional photographs of a person’s jaw before implantation, and can correctly assess the condition of the bone tissue, the location of nerves and blood vessels, and select the optimal size of the implant.

Nerve damage during implantation: diagnosis, treatment, prevention

Damage to branches of the trigeminal nerve (eg, inferior alveolar, lingual, mental, or infraorbital) is a potential complication that can develop during the dental implant procedure.

Direct damage to the nerve fiber can be caused by injury, inflammation, or the result of an infectious factor. Most often, the branches of the trigeminal nerve are affected during anesthesia, flap separation, bone augmentation, osteotomy and direct installation of a titanium intraosseous support. Since the restoration of damaged nerve fibers is quite problematic, the best tactics for treating such complications is prevention. Therefore, it is extremely important for the doctor to understand the features of the histology and anatomy of the nerves of the maxillofacial region, and to be informed about the symptoms that most often accompany their lesions. Also, the clinician must take into account aspects of differential diagnosis in order to correctly establish the cause of the development of certain symptoms, based on which in the future he will have to carry out appropriate treatment. Treatment options for trigeminal nerve branch lesions include the use of various pharmacological agents, monitoring with physical therapy, or even removal of the problematic dental implant.

In this article we will discuss approaches to the treatment of dental patients with damage to the nerves of the maxillofacial area associated with the dental implantation procedure, as well as the main aspects of the etiology and pathogenesis of such pathologies in general.

Anatomy and histology of the trigeminal nerve

The trigeminal nerve is the fifth and largest pair of cranial nerves, which consists of the following branches: the ophthalmic nerve (V1), the maxillary nerve (V2), and the mandibular nerve (V3). The mandibular nerve is the largest branch and innervates the lower lip, chin area, teeth, adjacent soft tissues, lower jaw and part of the external ear. The motor fibers of the mandibular nerve are not damaged during the implantation procedure because they arise from the main branch of V3 before exiting the mental foramen. The main structural unit of a nerve is the nerve fiber. The structure of V3 is dominated by myelinated nerve fibers. Each axon and Schwann cell is covered in connective tissue called the endoneurium. Groups of nerve fibers form bundles that are surrounded by epineurium. Damage to any part of the nerve bundle can lead to neurosensory impairment. The trigeminal nerve consists of 7000-12000 axons, and the number of bundles varies in different parts of the maxillofacial region. The inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) is polyfascicular (consisting of more than 10 fascicles), while the lingual nerve contains only a few similar nerve structures. Since the NAN is characterized by a large number of nerve bundles, its regenerative abilities are also significantly higher compared to the lingual nerve.

Types of nerve lesions

Lesions of the trigeminal nerve can be caused by compression, stretching, complete or partial disruption of the integrity of the nerve fiber. Damage may result in neurosensory changes in touch, pressure, temperature, and pain. Such pathologies significantly affect the patient’s comfort and ability to talk, eat, kiss, shave, apply makeup, brush teeth and drink normally. In addition, neurosensory disorders also affect the patient's ability to interact normally in society. Signs of these pathologies can be identified directly during surgery (if there is a pain symptom), or during long-term monitoring of the patient’s condition. To describe traumatic lesions of axons of varying degrees of complexity, the following terms are used:

- neurapraxia - a lesion in which the integrity of the nerve fiber is preserved, and the mechanism of injury is associated with stretching or impact such as blunt trauma; Sensitivity usually returns to normal within a few days or weeks.

- axonotmesis - damage to the nerve, in which the processes of its degeneration and regeneration develop, but the axon itself does not lose its integrity, and sensitivity is normalized over 2-4 months; however, sensitivity after recovery may be slightly less than before the intervention, and in some clinical cases it is characterized by accompanying dysesthesia.

- neurotmesis - damage to the nerve, in which there is a violation of its integrity, and the prognosis for the restoration of normal sensitivity is unfavorable.

The International Association for the Study of Pain has standardized nomenclature regarding traumatic nerve injuries. In particular, the definition of the term paresthesia, which was previously used to refer to loss of sensation, was changed. Current terminology provides the following definitions:

- paresthesia - a change in sensitivity without accompanying discomfort;

- dysesthesia - a change in sensitivity, which is accompanied by unpleasant sensations;

- anesthesia - loss of sensitivity.

To describe changes in neurosensory functions, terms such as allodynia (the occurrence of pain to stimuli that normally do not provoke pain), causalgia (the presence of persistent burning pain), hypoesthesia (decreased sensitivity to the action of stimuli), hyperesthesia (increased sensitivity to action) are also used. irritants).

When nerves are stretched or compressed, the perineurium protects the bundles from damage. However, lengthening the nerve by more than 30% can provoke structural damage. When the integrity of the nerve is completely disrupted, symptoms of anesthesia and a decrease in certain sensory functions develop. When the integrity of the nerve fiber is partially disrupted, various symptoms of damage, including dysesthesia, may be observed. It should be noted that the presence of persistent pain after surgery is not a criterion for determining the potential for complete restoration of the function of the affected fiber.

After damage to the peripheral nerve, Wallerian degeneration begins to develop, which continues for several weeks and even months. Axonal necrosis develops distal to the site of traumatic intersection. Degeneration in such cases is progressive and irreversible and lasts for up to 18 months. The ability of the affected nerve area to heal is influenced by factors such as the patient's general health, age, and type of injury. A key point in the process of nerve recovery after damage is the formation of scar tissue in the area of ​​endoneurial tubules.

Evaluation of traumatic lesions of the trigeminal nerve

NAN is most often affected during the installation of dental implants. Signs of inferior alveolar nerve involvement include anesthesia, paresthesia, or dysesthesia in the skin, lower lip, cheek, and gums up to the second molar site. Patients with damage to the lingual nerve are characterized by uncontrolled salivation, biting the tongue, a feeling of heartburn, loss of taste, changes in speech and swallowing function, numbness of the mucous membrane and tongue. Both during and after surgery, all potential symptoms of sensorineural impairment should be documented. Areas of altered sensitivity are mapped (both by location and area of ​​the affected area). Thus, it is possible to monitor changes in all parameters in the future, and determine whether the patient needs microsurgical intervention or not. To identify and determine the extent of disorders, both objective and subjective diagnostic tests are used, which are conventionally divided into mechanoceptive (response to mechanical stimuli and compression) and nociceptive (sensation of pain).

Mechanoceptive tests include static touch with a soft brush, two-point discrimination, and determination of the direction of brush movement. The sensation of a needle prick and the recognition of thermal stimuli are classified as nociceptive diagnostic procedures. To compare indicators, not only the affected area is always diagnosed, but also a symmetrical area, thus accurately identifying the fact and degree of neurosensory impairment. If the patient complains of loss of taste, a cotton swab moistened with salt or sugar is used for diagnosis.

Prevalence of traumatic nerve injuries

After implantation, permanent loss of sensitivity in the lip area due to traumatic damage to nerve fibers is observed in 0-36% of clinical cases. However, these data can be considered somewhat outdated and do not correspond to the approaches of modern implantological practice. After all, earlier during operations, dental surgeons more often used vestibular incisions, which caused sensitivity disorders to develop. Today, during the installation of dental implants, midline mucosal incisions are made along the top of the residual ridge, and the entire procedure is pre-planned, taking into account the data obtained after a computed tomographic examination. Thus, it can be assumed that the prevalence of nerve fiber damage due to implantation is significantly less than 36%.

Dannan et al reported that the incidence of nerve damage with implantation was as high as 2.95% (5 of 169 patients treated) in cases of temporary neurosensory changes, and 1.7% in cases of irreversible implant-associated neuropathies. Another study found that the incidence of nerve damage after maxillofacial surgery was 2.69% (42 of 1559 patients), with an even lower percentage of irreversible neurosensory damage, but the exact number was not specified in the study. . In the author's opinion, however, even such rates of implant-associated damage to neural structures are too high for clinical practice. Transient loss of sensation in the lip can often be associated with swelling, which is observed during the first two weeks after surgery.

Traumatic damage to the lingual nerve during surgical procedures

The lingual nerve in the region of the mandibular molars passes through the soft tissues on the lingual side of the jaw. Sometimes the nerve is located coronal to the surface of the bone tissue and is tightly adjacent to the cortical bone plate on the lingual side. Therefore, any surgical interventions must be carried out very carefully in this area. After removal of the third molars of the mandible, lesions of the lingual nerve are observed in 0.5-2.1% of clinical cases. Traumatic disorders of the lingual nerve during dental implantation are not a common phenomenon and are recorded quite rarely. To prevent such complications when installing dental implants, the following rules should be followed: only intrasulcular incisions can be made without releasing incisions and flap separation from the lingual side; During flap separation, it is necessary to avoid overstretching it and maintain a safe distance when performing osteotomy. 90% of all recorded cases of neurosensory changes associated with lesions of the lingual nerve resolve within 8-10 weeks after surgery.

Preoperative planning: prevention of traumatic nerve injuries

To prevent most complications associated with the installation of dental implants, it is necessary to ensure careful planning of the surgical intervention. Using the capabilities of computed tomography and surgical templates allows you to avoid unexpected outcomes of iatrogenic intervention. When installing a dental implant, a minimum of 2 mm of bone thickness must be left between the apical part and the coronal part of the mandibular nerve canal. In addition, it is important to adhere to the specified osteotomy length and strictly follow the bone preparation protocol. The presence of 2 mm of bone thickness also avoids excessive bone compression in the area of ​​the nerve after installation of a titanium intraosseous support (photos 1 - 2).

Photo 1. The implant was installed in the area of ​​the 30th tooth. After the anesthesia wore off, the patient began to complain of parasthesia in the area of ​​the right lip and chin. On an x-ray taken immediately after implantation, there are no signs of implant penetration into the mandibular nerve canal.

Photo 2. The implant was installed 10 years ago, and during this time the patient was able to adapt to changes in sensitivity. The CBCT image shows that the implant in the area of ​​the 30th tooth is much closer to the nerve canal than previously thought.

If necessary, to ensure the safety of the intervention, short dental implants can be used. It is also important for the doctor to be familiar with the absolute length of all drills that are used during the manipulation, since failure to take these parameters into account can provoke excessive deepening by more than 0.4-1.5 mm relative to the selected safe boundary. To control the deepening into the bone tissue, it is also recommended to use special stoppers. However, the physician must understand that neither the thickness nor the density of the bone tissue over the area of ​​the nerve ensures the safety of its condition during the osteotomy procedure, therefore applying too much force and pressure during the preparation of the bone tissue is strictly prohibited. Finally, it should be noted that up to 50% of lawsuits related to nerve damage after implantation are caused by the lack of informed consent on the part of the patient, which the doctor must obtain before surgery. It is also a good idea to assess the patient’s neurosensory parameters before the intervention in order to compare them with the data that will be obtained after implantation.

Local anesthesia: a potential cause of nerve damage

Traumatic lesions of the mandibular and lingual nerves can occur during anesthesia due to needle trauma, hematoma, and exposure to the components of the anesthetic solution. The mechanisms of such lesions are still quite unexplored. One retrospective study estimated the incidence of nerve injury during anesthesia to be between 1/26,762 and 1/160,5716 cases, while Haas and Lennon predicted the incidence of such complications to be 1/785,000. Other data suggest that the prevalence of short-term transient lesions of the mandibular and lingual nerves as a result of anesthesia ranges from 0.15% to 0.54%. Whereas cases of the development of permanent changes in sensitivity of the same etiology are quite rare, with a prevalence of 0.0001-0.01%. After performing mandibular anesthesia, 3-7% of patients experience electrical sensations that resolve spontaneously over time. However, when the clinician notes that the patient has overreacted to the needle insertion, the needle may need to be withdrawn and repositioned slightly. Methods for the treatment or prevention of nervous complications associated with the anesthesia procedure have not yet been developed. Between 70% and 89% of anesthesia-related neurosensory lesions develop in the region of the lingual nerve. This trend can be explained by the fact that the lingual nerve consists of only a few bundles, while the lower alveolar nerve consists of a huge number of them, which, in turn, increases its potential for regeneration. From a geometric point of view, everything is explained much more simply: the size of the needle is on average 0.45 mm, while the diameter of the lingual nerve is 1.86 mm, and the diameter of the inferior alveolar nerve is 3 mm.

Anesthesia-associated nephropathy most often develops after anesthesia with 4% solutions of articaine or pilocarpine. Compared to lidocaine, pilocarpine and articaine cause 7.3 and 3.6 times more neurosensory impairment. Garisto et al reported that in 4 of 9 studies, the complication rate was higher with prilocaine or articaine 4% solutions than with lower concentration anesthetic injections. According to the authors, local anesthesia with these drugs should be avoided in order to reduce the incidence of associated neuropathies after iatrogenic interventions. However, according to Malamed, the cases in which Arcticaine has demonstrated a greater association with neuropathies than lidocaine are anecdotal, and do not have sufficient evidence-based argumentation. Similarly, in 2013, after an extensive review of the literature, Toma and colleagues concluded that studies suggesting extreme neurotoxicity of articaine were retrospective in design, the data presented were at high risk of bias, and the findings should not be regarded as sufficient evidence. . The authors concluded that direct trauma to the nerve fiber is the predominant cause of neurosensory impairment, and the latter has little to do with the chemical toxicity of the anesthetics used. In general, there is disagreement in the literature on this issue; Therefore, clinicians should make decisions regarding the use of higher concentrations of anesthetics based on the conditions of each individual clinical case, while interpreting prior information and taking into account the recommendations of the drug manufacturers.

Osteotomy procedure for implantation

The osteotomy procedure should be performed using well-sharpened drills and abundant irrigation. Hypothetically, overheating of the intervention area during osteotomy can provoke traumatic nerve damage. The extent of bone necrosis caused by overheating is directly proportional to the preparation temperature under which iatrogenic intervention was performed.

Eriksson and Albrektsson summarized that performing an osteotomy at 47°C for 1 minute may provoke subsequent bone resorption. In cases of progressive resorption, given the shift in the position of the mental foramen, a transcrete incision is contraindicated; instead, it should be shifted to the lingual side. When placing implants anterior to the mental foramen, careful analysis of CT images should be performed, which may help detect the presence of a loop of mental nerve.

Flap separation procedures

As a rule, flap separation does not provoke any neurosensory disturbances, however, the doctor should still pay great attention when performing this iatrogenic intervention in the chin area. The doctor must clearly understand where the mental nerve exits the mental foramen, so that when separating the flap it does not cause damage to the nerve fiber.

Tooth extraction

Before extracting molars and premolars in the lower jaw for subsequent installation of dental implants, the relationship between the position of their roots relative to the course of the inferior alveolar and mental nerves should be carefully studied. Care should also be taken to curettage the sockets after resection, since periapical lesions may often be close to neural structures (Figures 3–4).

Photo 3. The patient sought help for pain in the area of ​​the 31st tooth. The X-ray image shows signs of acute apical periodontitis.

Photo 4. The results of CBCT diagnostics indicate that the pathological focus is located near the nerve canal. The tooth was carefully removed, followed by careful curettage of the defect area.

Pharmacological therapy of neuropathies associated with the installation of dental implants

There is no clear opinion regarding which drugs are best to use in diagnosing traumatic lesions of the nerves of the maxillofacial area. Some authors prefer corticosteroids and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). It is worth remembering that the use of various pharmacological agents is relevant only if the integrity of the nerve fiber as a whole is preserved. In cases of sensory impairment after injection, the patient can be given dexamethasone 4 g/ml directly to the area of ​​the injury, and after 3 days the dose of steroids can be increased. If a nerve is compressed or a fiber is injured during surgery, 1-2 ml of dexamethasone is administered intravenously, after which dexamethasone is prescribed orally for 6 days (4 mg, 2 tablets after meals for three days, then 1 tablet after meals for another three days). If the integrity of the nerve is compromised, steroids may be prescribed for a period of 5 to 7 days. Impaired sensitivity can be relieved by 800 mg of ibuprofen, which should be taken three times a day for 3 weeks. If neuropathy develops after removal of the implant, patients can also be prescribed 800 mg of ibuprofen three times a day and with the same frequency 500 mg of amoxicillin for 5-7 days. In parallel, 50 g of prednisolone is prescribed, reducing the dose by 10 mg every day (for 5 days). Post-traumatic neuropathy can be treated with low doses of antidepressants and antiepileptic drugs.

In combination with a pharmaceutical approach, Renton and Yilma recommend physical therapy interventions for patients with chronic neuropathy. The goal of such a treatment algorithm is to reduce the patient’s discomfort and help him get rid of pain. Bagheri and Meyer generally question the effectiveness of corticosteroids in the treatment of traumatic lesions of the inferior alveolar nerve, since the density of the bone tissue forming the nerve canal is so high that it is simply impossible for medications to reach their space. At this time, there are no results from clinical studies that confirm the feasibility and success of using corticosteroids or NSAIDs for traumatic neuropathies associated with the installation of dental implants.

When to refer a patient to a microsurgeon

Universal recommendations regarding when to refer patients with traumatic trigeminal neuropathies to a microsurgeon have not yet been developed. Some authors argue that the patient should be referred to a specialist immediately after noticing sensory disturbances after the implantation procedure. Other researchers recommend referral to a microsurgeon after 2, 3, 4, or even 6 months of monitoring if signs of traumatic neuropathy are observed during these months. Ziccardi and Zuniga recommend microsurgical intervention for up to 1 year after the implantation procedure, since the effectiveness of microsurgical correction noticeably decreases one year after the intervention. When determining the fact of traumatic neuropathy after implantation, the physician must determine whether the patient needs to be referred to a microsurgeon, or whether the situation can be improved with the use of various pharmacological drugs.

Sometimes explantation, or slight “unscrewing” of the implant from the bone, can help resolve the symptoms of traumatic sensory dysfunction. The results of individual studies indicate that the advisability of referral to a microsurgeon is justified only by stating the fact of a complete violation of the integrity of the nerve. When the doctor is sure that he did not violate the integrity of the bone canal of the nerve, then the disturbance in sensitivity can be caused by compression of the nerve fiber or an inflammatory effect. In such cases, a pharmacological approach to treatment can also help. Meanwhile, the doctor must understand that even if he did not perforate the main nerve canal, the nerve often has additional branches, the course of which is quite difficult to predict. The latter is possible only with a careful analysis of the data obtained after CBCT scanning, because two-dimensional radiographs provoke superimposition of individual anatomical structures, therefore, the prediction of possible traumatic nerve damage with their help is ineffective (photo 1-2).

In cases of discomfort after implant installation, if it can be confirmed that the intraosseous support is not located near the nerve canal, treatment algorithms are variable. Bagheri and Meyer suggest monitoring for 3 to 4 months to see if sensory improvements are observed before referring the patient to a microsurgeon. The authors also claim that if the position of the implant is too close to the nerve, the level of compression of the latter can be reduced by a slight reverse movement of the implant. Other researchers suggest explanting the intraosseous construct within 36 hours and immediately prescribing steroids if the patient exhibits signs of neurosensory impairment after surgery.

Khawaja and Renton described four clinical cases of the development of sensory symptoms after the installation of dental implants, in which the intraosseous structure was not located near the nerve. However, upon explantation, the symptoms of neurosensory disorders resolved quite quickly in two of the four patients. Interestingly, positive dynamics were observed in patients whose implants were removed within 18 and 36 hours, and residual symptoms were observed in patients whose explantation was performed 3 and 4 days after surgery.

Renton, Dawood and colleagues suggest that patients with such symptoms should be monitored for no more than 3 months, since after this period the risk of developing neural changes outweighs the potential success of microsurgery. Ziccardi and Steinberg in their review article recommend initial monitoring for 1 month, and if symptoms improve, continue to monitor the patient. If the symptoms do not improve or worsen, it is necessary to refer the patient to a microsurgeon. Research results indicate that patients operated on for neurosensory impairment 6-8 months after implantation have the same level of success as patients operated on in a shorter period after iatrogenic intervention. According to the authors, earlier intervention is possible and more effective, but there is no evidence to support this assumption. In addition, microsurgery is not indicated in cases of only minor neurosensory changes, since the risk from the intervention itself in such cases exceeds the predicted success rate. There is also a 12-week waiting period - on average, this is the amount of time a doctor needs to decide whether to refer a patient for microsurgical surgery.

It is logical that in cases where patients have acute pain, it is not necessary to wait 12 weeks. Before arguing for certain approaches to treatment, the doctor must objectively compare X-ray data and clinical symptoms, and then take into account all possible medico-legal aspects of the violations.

Surgical restoration of damaged trigeminal nerve

There are specific reasons that justify the need for microsurgical restoration of the damaged trigeminal nerve, and contractual factors that determine the prognosis of this manipulation. Ziccardi and Zuniga formulated the following list of reasons that justify referral of a patient to a microsurgeon: sensory impairment that persists for more than 3 months and interferes with the patient’s normal life activities, confirmation of the fact of nerve transection, lack of improvement in signs of hypoesthesia, development of pain after implantation. After microsurgical correction is performed, a number of factors influence the success of it: the waiting time after implantation, the type and volume of the lesion, the degree of vascularization of the affected area, the experience of the surgeon, the method of harvesting and preparing the graft, the presence of tension in the repair area, the age and general health of the patient.

In fact, microsurgical restoration of the branches of the lingual and inferior alveolar nerves is possible. However, the success rate of such manipulations is very variable - on average, researchers indicate only 50-59.4% effectiveness of such treatment, and in only two studies the results of the intervention reached levels of 81.7% and 63.1%. In all the studies conducted, the number of subjects is quite small, so it is methodologically impossible to compare the final results of such studies. However, 50-60% of patients after microsurgical correction show signs of improvement in neurological impairment. Ziccardi and Zuniga warn that patients with severe sensorineural impairment should be informed that full rehabilitation is virtually impossible. Also, many researchers indicate that the effectiveness of microsurgical procedures in cases of treatment of anesthesia, dysesthesia and spontaneous pain is exaggerated. To summarize, microsurgical correction can help individual patients, but the level of predictability of the results of such treatment is ambiguous. Thus, the best treatment for neurosensory disorders associated with implantation is their prevention.

Conclusion

A common dilemma in clinical practice is: if an implant is successfully osseointegrated but causes mild paresthesia without pain, what should be done with it? After all, explantation may not always help resolve symptoms, and retention of the implant in the bone with actual nerve damage can trigger the development of neuroma. The latter is formed as a result of excessive healing of the area of ​​​​the damaged nerve and hyperplasia of adjacent tissues, and very often requires subsequent surgical removal. The decision to choose a possible treatment method should be made together with the patient after a thorough discussion of all possible options, and before starting rehabilitation, the patient must formally confirm his consent by filling out a special written form.

Authors: Gary Greenstein, DDS, MS Joseph R. Carpentieri, DDS John Cavallaro, DDS

Our team of doctors

Maxillofacial surgeon, Implantologist

Bocharov Maxim Viktorovich

Experience: 11 years

Dental surgeon, Implantologist

Chernov Dmitry Anatolievich

Experience: 29 years

Orthopedist, Neuromuscular dentist

Stepanov Andrey Vasilievich

Experience: 22 years

Endodontist, Therapist

Skalet Yana Alexandrovna

Experience: 22 years

Orthopedic dentist

Tsoi Sergey Konstantinovich

Experience: 19 years

Dentist-orthodontist

Enikeeva Anna Stanislavovna

Experience: 3 years

Treatment of post-traumatic sensory neuropathy

The most problematic result of dental surgery, local anesthesia or endodontic treatment is damage to the trigeminal nerve with subsequent dysfunction, most often of the inferior alveolar (IAN) and/or lingual nerve (LN). Altered sensations and pain in the orofacial area associated with damage to the branches of the trigeminal nerve can interfere with pronouncing sounds, eating and drinking, kissing, shaving, applying makeup, brushing teeth, and even working and sleeping.

Treatment of post-traumatic sensory neuropathy depends primarily on the causes and mechanisms of nerve damage and, most importantly, on the time after injury until treatment begins.

The trigeminal nerve is the largest peripheral sensory nerve in the human body, which is represented by more than 40% of the sensory cortex, so making the only correct decision about therapeutic tactics for a clinician after its injury is always a difficult task.

The most commonly iatrogenically injured branches of the trigeminal nerve are the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) and the lingual nerve (LN).

The lingual nerve is located freely in the soft tissues, so the main causes of its damage are the removal of third molars and local anesthesia.

The inferior alveolar nerve is located in the bony canal of the mandible and the main causes of its damage include implantation, apical infection, endodontic treatment, and periapical surgery.

Rice. 1. Morphological preparation of the lower third of the face demonstrating the prepared lingual nerve, which runs deep in the soft tissues and is adjacent to the lingual surface of the mandible in the retromolar region.

Rice. 2. Schematic representation of the course of the lingual and inferior alveolar nerve.

After iatrogenic damage to the trigeminal nerve, the patient experiences not only impaired sensory function, but also a decrease in quality of life, psychological discomfort and social problems, the manifestation of which is more persistent in cases where the patient is older, and the time from the day of injury until the doctor recognizes the damage and makes therapeutic decisions more than 48 hours. It is also important to remember that post-traumatic consequences are more severe the more proximal the injury is to the cell body.

It is almost always difficult for patients to accept and cope with these negative consequences of oral and maxillofacial surgery, since third molar extraction or implantation is often an optional procedure, and the patient, choosing in favor of such surgical treatment, expects significant functional and/or aesthetic improvements.

There is still no consensus on treatment protocols for such injuries, but there is a clear understanding that the management and success of treatment of sensorineural deficits will be influenced by the mechanism and duration of nerve injury, injury-related clinical signs and symptoms, including psychological, functional or pain-related complaints of patients .

A recent Cochrane systematic review of treatment options for post-traumatic neuropathy resulting from dental procedures concluded that there is still a need for randomized controlled clinical trials to examine the effectiveness of surgical, medical and psychological treatments for iatrogenic injuries of the inferior alveolar and lingual nerves.

Coulthard P, Kushnerev E, Yates JM, Walsh T, Patel N, Bailey E, Renton TF. Interventions for iatrogenic inferior alveolar and lingual nerve injury. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014 Apr 16;(4):CD005293.

The priority when managing these patients is to have an honest conversation with the doctor about whether the nerve damage is permanent or temporary. This will help the patient make responsible decisions about surgical treatment, but pain control and rehabilitation should be started as early as possible, taking into account the psychological problems associated with iatrogenesis of the injury.

There is a false belief that most trigeminal nerve injuries recover, when in fact, for example, lingual nerve injuries associated with the creation of a lingual surgical approach are restored after 10 weeks and in only 88% of cases.

Symptoms and stages of damage

The symptoms by which this complication can be recognized are as follows:

• numbness of parts of the head - tongue, lips, chin, cheeks, etc.;
• biting lips and tongue;
• choking while eating or drinking;
• profuse salivation.

All this creates a number of inconveniences for the patient: it makes it difficult to eat and talk, disrupts facial expressions, and also prevents men from shaving and women from applying makeup. The severity of this injury is determined by its degree: a minor one goes away on its own or with the help of drug treatment, a severe one leads to irreversible processes of nerve degeneration and is not curable. Damage to the mandibular nerve, the symptoms of which the patient observes, requires immediate consultation with a doctor - only a specialist will be able to determine its extent and provide timely assistance.

Dentists distinguish the following stages of this implantation complication:

• minor - neuropraxia;
• more severe, but partial damage - axonotmesis;
• a serious injury that leads to complete loss of sensitivity - neurotmesis.

Post-traumatic sensory nerve damage. Terminology.

The Association for the Study of Pain has standardized a nomenclature system that defines the most commonly used neurosensory descriptive terms Classification of Chronic Pain, Second Edition: International Association for the Study of Pain Task Force on Taxonomy, ed.: H Merskey and N. Bogduk. IASP Press IASP Council in Kyoto, November 29-30-2007.

1. Paresthesia is a non-painful altered sensation. May be described by patients as a pins and needles, slight burning or tingling sensation. NEW sensations - stretching, pulling sensations.
2. Dysesthesia is perverted sensations. Abnormal, sometimes unpleasant sensations experienced by a person with partial damage to sensory nerve fibers when touching the skin. - Unpleasant abnormal sensation, spontaneous or provoked. Note : Dysesthesia is not pain when it hurts or paresthesia. Special cases of dysesthesia are hyperalgesia and allodynia. Dysesthesia should always be unpleasant , and paresthesia should not be unpleasant, although it is recognized that the boundary can create some difficulties when it comes to whether these sensations are pleasant or unpleasant. It should always be stated whether the sensations are spontaneous or provoked.
3. Neuropathic pain (IASP) is pain caused by damage or disease of the somatosensory nervous system.
4. Neuropathy (IASP) is a dysfunction or pathological change in a nerve: in one nerve - mononeuropathy; in several nerves - mononeuropathic multiplex; if diffuse and bilateral - polyneuropathy. Note : Neuritis is a special case of neuropathy and is currently a term reserved for inflammatory processes affecting the nerves. - sensitive (touch, heat, pain) - motor (movement).
5. Allodynia is pain from non-noxious stimuli (pain with light touch/cold/heat). The appearance of pain in response to a stimulus that does not cause pain in healthy people. Thermal allodynia, especially cold allodynia, is a feature of the extraoral dermatome in patients with IANIs. Some patients report decreased taste and heat sensitivity. Perversion of sensitivity is characterized by an increased threshold of sensitivity and increased duration of perception, lack of precise localization of sensations of an unpleasant nature, and a tendency to irradiate. The pain continues when the stimulus is removed.
6. Hyperalgesia - increased sensitivity to painful stimuli
7. Anesthesia - numbness
8. Hyperesthesia and Hypostesthesia are terms that are often used to describe changes in sensitivity that increase or decrease, respectively.

Rice. 5 Anatomy of the II (maxillary) and III (mandibular) branches of the trigeminal nerve. It is important to note that the branches of the superior alveolar nerve retrogradely “merge” into the infraorbital nerve, which explains the symptoms of swelling and pain in the infraorbital region when the superior dental plexus is damaged.

Post-traumatic sensory neuropathy is pain that develops after medical intervention (surgery, treatment, anesthesia), with a minimum duration of 2 months, while other causes of pain are excluded (infection, persistent malignancy, misdiagnosis, etc.), preoperative pain from others must also be excluded reasons.

It is important to add that the neuropathic area does not have to be clearly indicated by the patient, however, about 80% of patients can localize and indicate the neuropathic area.

HERE you can read more about the incidence of “phantom toothache” (atypical odontalgia) after endodontic treatment, which is classified as persistent dentoalveolar pain (PDAP type 2) and occurs in up to 3% of cases.

Recovery and treatment

In the first case, self-recovery takes approximately 1 month; the help of doctors is not needed, since there is no anatomical damage. Symptoms of the second appear after a while - usually 6-8 weeks, so recovery can be painful and incomplete: it will take more than 2 months. In the third stage of damage to the mandibular nerve, treatment gives results only at the beginning and is performed surgically, since we are talking about degeneration with a violation of integrity. Loss of sensitivity, which is observed in a patient for more than 3 months, indicates a high probability of losing it forever. Damage to the mandibular nerve, the consequences of which is the lack of sensitivity of the nerve for a year, leads to irreversible changes. Only the professionalism and responsibility of the doctor, which is guaranteed by the specialists of our Implantmaster clinic, can protect the patient from such unpleasant injuries.

Author:

Features of manifestations of iatrogenic damage to the trigeminal nerve

1. Painful discomfort, changes in sensations, numbness (anesthesia).
2. Functional consequences - Patients who experience pain from touch or cold often have difficulty with daily functions: kissing, communicating, speaking, eating and drinking, etc. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22677874
3. Psychological consequences - patients develop various anxiety, fear, anger, post-traumatic stress disorder. Psychological disorders can be aggravated in cases where informed consent for implantation, endodontic treatment, orthognathic surgery, etc., which specifically indicates possible nerve damage, has not been signed before medical intervention.

Rice. 6. Schematic representation of the relationship of the branches of the inferior alveolar nerve with the formed implant bed. Pain during drilling is an important diagnostic criterion for the proximity of the nerve.